|
|
|
Class Actions
Grande Law Offices is committed to aggressively litigating public interest cases on behalf of consumers and small business. Often the best way to achieve justice for large numbers of persons is to litigate a class action or group action.
Grande Law Offices has been at the forefront of legislative and litigation class action intitiatives on behalf of consumers and small businesses.
Legislation - Grande Law Offices helped secure passage of amendments to Hawai'i's Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices statute, providing for a private right to file class actions for small businesses and for victims of indirect anti-trust activity.
Litigation - Grande Law Offices recent class action successes include:
• $4.8 million class action settlement that paid to nursing home residents who were sold recycled pills.
• $2.26 million class action settlement that paid by Allstate Insurance for improperly setting insurance rates based on credit scores.
• $1.2 million class action settlement that paid by State Farm Insurance for improperly setting insurance rates based on credit scores.
• $1.8 million class action settlement that paid by Hilton Hotels for not disclosing mold contamination to its guests.
University Named in Privacy Breach Lawsuit
Grande Law Offices
has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of 100,000 University of
Hawai'i alumni, students, faculty, staff and guests who were victims of data
breaches. The four data breaches occurred on three campuses in 2009 and
2010. The lawsuit seeks an injunction to require the University to take
appropriate measures to safeguard personal information and damages for
the class members to pay for credit report monitoring and other expenses
associated with protecting their identity.
“The University has exhibited both a cavalier and callous attitude toward protecting privacy rights,” said Thomas Grande, one of the attorneys for the class.
“The
University has clearly not taken its privacy responsibilities
seriously.” Grande said. “And once security breaches have occurred,
the University has left it to the victims of the breach to take actions
to protect themselves,” he said.
Visit http://www.UHDataBreachLawsuit.com for more information.
To read Honolulu Star-Advertiser news coverage, click here and here.
To read KHON news coverage, click here.
To read KITV news coverage, click here.
To read Hawai'i News Now (KGMB KHNL KFVE) news coverage, click here.
Home Lands Case Recertified for Damages
Judge
Virginia Crandall has recertified the Hawaiian Home Lands case to
include the amount of damages to be awarded. A written order has not
been entered. For updates on the case, please go to http://www.Kalima-Lawsuit.com.
State Found Liable in Home Lands Case
Thomas Grande announced a decision by Judge Eden E. Hifo, who ruled that the State of Hawai'i
is liable for breaches of trust to Native Hawaiian beneficiaries of the
Hawaiian Home Lands Trust that led to delays in homestead awards.
“The
Court held the State liable for failing to award homesteads to our
clients between 1959 and 1988,” Grande explained. “Some of our clients
waited more than thirty years or more for a homestead award and some
still are waiting,” Grande said.
The
case was filed in 1999 by Grande and co-counsel Carl Varady on behalf
of a group of Hawaiian Home Lands Trust beneficiaries. These
beneficiaries filed breach of trust claims with an administrative panel
set up by the State of Hawai'i in 1991. When the State did not complete the administrative process and shut down the panel in 1999, the lawsuit was filed.
Judge
Hifo found that “the primary reason for the trust was and is to award
eligible beneficiaries homesteads. Failure to do so constitutes breach
of the trust and applicable trust duties…” Kalima v. State, Civil No.
99-04771-12(EEH) November 3, 2009 Decision Regarding Liability and Legal
Causation Following Bifurcated Trial on Aforesaid issues (“Decision”) ¶
10 at 12.
Judge
Hifo also found that “By any measure and any method the clear and
convincing evidence proves the award of significantly more homesteads
would have occurred during the claims period if the Defendant State had
cured its own breaches and those of the predecessor trustee for which
the State became equally responsible as the successor
trustee..."Decision, ¶ 15 at 14.
Among the breaches of trust by the State were the following:
• DHHL
could not qualify to issue bonds to fund homesteads because DHHL
financial records were lost from 1962 to 1972 and DHHL did not meet
general accounting standards until 1985. Decision ¶ 4 at 6-7.
• “The
State took no action to identify the [DHHL] land inventory during most
or all of the claims period…Failure to ascertain the property within the
trust and to correct that same failure by the predecessor trustee [the
United States] constitution breach of trust by the State…” Decision ¶ 5
at 8.
• It
is undisputed that more than 29,000 acres of Hawaiian home lands were
withdrawn from the trust by executive orders or proclamations
[which]…provided no compensation to the trust” This land was valued at
more than $100 million. Decision ¶ 5 at 8.
“We
want to thank our clients for their support and their patience. We are
committed to seeing this case through to its successful conclusion,”
Grande noted.
To read Honolulu Star-Bulletin news coverage, click here.
To read Hawai'i News Now (KGMB KHNL KFVE) news coverage, click here.
Pet Food Class Action Settlement Highest in US & Canada
Grande Law Offices has obtained the first certification and settlement in the United States of a class action lawsuit for consumer purchase and pet screening claims against pet food manufacturer Menu Foods for its sale of contaminated pet food. The case resulted in the highest settlement in the United States and Canada for any state or province.
Out of 120 cases filed nationwide, the case filed by Grande Law Offices was the only one to successfully stay in state court.
"We wanted to make sure that our class members got the protection of Hawaii's consumer statute, which is one of the strongest in the United States," Thomas Grande told media representatives at the press conference announcing the settlement.
"Our strategy worked," Grande noted. "We got $240,000 for consumer and pet screening claims for Hawai'i residents; the rest of the United States and Canada combined got $650,000. It emphasizes the importance of having Hawai'i courts resolve claims for Hawai'i's citizens," Grande said.
To see Honolulu Star-Bulletin news coverage, click here.
|